Please use the Search bar to access the archives instead of the Alphabetical / Chronological Archives as we are experiencing technical difficulties with those areas of the website. Thank you.

back to blog home | about Rabbi Buchwald |  back to main NJOP site

Yitro 5762-2002

“Structural Secrets of the Decalogue”

by Rabbi Ephraim Z. Buchwald

In this coming week’s parasha, parashat Yitro, in Exodus 20, we encounter the Aseret Ha’dibrot, the Ten Commandments. The Decalogue, of course, is repeated again in Deuteronomy 5.

The Aseret Ha’dibrot, the Decalogue, the ten statements, as they are properly called, are surely among the most important statements given to humankind. Being that these ten statements (or part of them) were the only words of the Torah that were actually spoken by G-d Himself to the People of Israel, they are properly regarded as a foremost element in Judaism.

Apart from their content, the Decalogue is also one of the most wondrous portions of the Torah in terms of structure. Many of us are familiar with the physical appearance of the Ten Commandments–two tablets, each containing 5 commandments or statements. The rabbis have indicated that this division is not arbitrary, but rather bears a profound structural message. The first five of the Ten Commandments, the rabbis point out, all deal with commandments that pertain to the human being’s relationship with G-d, whereas the last five commandments deal with relationships between human beings and their fellow human beings.

The rabbis of the Midrash conclude that the structural message goes even further. It is not at all coincidental, they maintain, that commandment 1 is placed opposite (facing) commandment 6, 2 opposite 7, 3 opposite 8, 4 opposite 9, and 5 opposite 10. These horizontal relationships, reflect the bilateral relationships that are to be found in the commandments that face each other on the tablets.

The late great Bible teacher, Prof. Nehama Leibowitz (1905-1997), points out in her Studies in Shemot, Exodus, that not only are there horizontal relationships between the commandments, there are vertical relationships as well. Statement 1 is related to statement 2, which is related to 3, to 4, and to 5. And similarly 6 to 10. To elucidate this point, Prof. Leibowitz analyzes the commandments according to the human capacity that is called upon in the observance of these mitzvot. So, for instance: What human capacity is called upon in the observance of the first commandment, “I am the Lord, thy G-d who brought thee out of the land of Egypt out of the house of bondage”? The answer is belief or thought. The second commandment, against idolatry, “Thou shall have no other gods before me” again employs belief and thought. The third commandment, “Thou shall not bear the name of the Lord, thy G-d in vain,” involves the human capacity of speech. The fourth and fifth commandments, Shabbat and honoring parents, involve action.

We now see that the first five commandments, those categorized by our rabbis as “Bain adam la’Makom,” the ones that deal with the relationship between the human being and G-d, progress structurally from thought, to speech, and finally to action.

The structural relationship repeats itself in the second set of five dibrot, commandments 6-10. Commandment number 6: “Lo tir’tzach,” Thou shall not murder, number 7: “Lo tin’af,” Thou shall not commit adultery, number 8: “Lo tig’nov,” Thou shall not steal–these three commandments involve action. Commandment number 9–against bearing false witness, once again involves the human capacity of speech. And finally, number 10, against covetous desires, involves the human capacity of thought. So we see that the second set of commandments, the inter-human commandments, progress from action, to speech, to thought–exactly the opposite of the first five.

Professor Leibowitz brilliantly points out that with regard to the human being’s relationship with G-d, we often think that thought or belief is paramount, yet the progression of the Decalogue implies that–yes, believe in G-d with a full heart, but belief must also be articulated in speech, and most importantly, must be confirmed by action. With regard to the last five statements of the Decalogue, we often think that with respect to relationships between the human being and fellow human beings the most important emphasis must be on action. That certainly is true. But, the structure of the Decalogue teaches us that it is not only vital to act properly, but also to speak properly, and finally, think properly about friends and neighbors.

We see that the Torah has some very powerful subliminal messages, that may not be articulated in the text, not written in the letters and ink, but are to be found instead in the white spaces. Just through the structure alone, we may see the infinite wisdom of G-d shining through. And, of course, all this wisdom is meant to make us more sensitive, more ethical, and more moral. It is meant to help make all human beings deserving of the appellation, “the Children of G-d.”

May you be blessed.